Chatrandom

Chatrandom review — 5.4/10, 3 trackers detected

Chatrandom is DirtyRoulette with a filter menu. Same operator — Mav Media LLC, United States — same random video chat model, same fundamental product. The difference is packaging. Chatrandom has gender and country filters, an Android app, AR video effects, and a dedicated gay section. DirtyRoulette has a text box and a next button. Both connect you to random strangers over webcam. Both run on user reports for moderation. Both exist in the space Omegle left when it shut down in November 2023, though neither site saw a documented traffic surge from that closure.

Traffic is 3.87 million monthly visits per Semrush for February 2026. DirtyRoulette pulls roughly similar numbers. Combined, Mav Media operates two random chat platforms serving somewhere around 7-8 million monthly visits under different brands with what appears to be overlapping infrastructure. The domain has been active since 2011, registered through Network Solutions with privacy-protected WHOIS. Average session duration is 9 minutes 19 seconds, which tells you people are cycling through enough connections to sustain a session — the roulette model means each individual interaction lasts seconds to minutes before someone hits next.

The site claims 32,000 users online at any given time. I have no way to verify that number and random chat platforms have a long history of inflating concurrent user counts. What I can verify is that during my testing session, connections were immediate. No waiting. Click next, get a new person. The speed of matching suggests either genuine volume or efficient queuing. Most connections lasted under thirty seconds — someone's camera was off, someone was clearly a bot displaying a looped video, someone was in a context I moved past quickly. This is the reality of random chat. You're not browsing a curated library. You're rolling dice on who the next person is.

Content is user-generated in real time. There's no library, no archive, no recorded content. What you see is who happens to be online at the same moment you are. The gender filter is the most important feature because without it, the random pool skews heavily male — a well-documented pattern across every Omegle-style platform. The free tier gives you basic random matching. Premium, at $6.99 per week or $19.99 per month, unlocks the gender filter to restrict matches to women, removes ads, and adds country filtering. The weekly pricing is aggressive — $6.99 per week annualizes to $364, which is more expensive than a yearly Pornhub Premium subscription. The monthly rate of $19.99 is more reasonable but still premium pricing for a service that provides no guaranteed content quality.

Blacklight scan on March 16, 2026: 3 ad trackers, 2 cookies. No canvas fingerprinting. No session recording. No keystroke capture. VirusTotal: 0/94. The 3 trackers put Chatrandom above most cam sites I've reviewed — Chaturbate has 0 trackers, Stripchat has 0, even Streamate only has 1. DirtyRoulette, the sister site, scanned at 3 trackers and 0 cookies, so Chatrandom adds 2 cookies to the same tracker count. For a platform where your webcam is active and your face is visible to strangers, 3 trackers is worth noting. No advanced surveillance flags, but the base tracking is heavier than the category norm.

The Android app exists on Google Play. No iOS app. The app provides the same random chat functionality as the web version with push notifications. Having an app at all puts Chatrandom ahead of DirtyRoulette, which is web-only.

Features beyond the core roulette: AR backgrounds that overlay your video feed — virtual backgrounds similar to Zoom's feature, presumably used by people who don't want their actual room visible to strangers. A dedicated gay section that filters for male-to-male connections. Text chat alongside video. Video effects and filters that modify your camera output. These are cosmetic additions to the same random matching engine, but they represent more product investment than DirtyRoulette received.

Moderation is the structural problem with every random chat platform and Chatrandom doesn't solve it. User reports are the primary mechanism. No published details on AI moderation, automated nudity detection, or proactive monitoring. The Omegle shutdown happened specifically because of unresolved moderation failures leading to child safety lawsuits. Chatrandom operates the same model — random strangers, live video, minimal identity verification — without publicly documenting how it addresses the same risks that killed Omegle. Mav Media has WIPO filings for both Chatrandom and DirtyRoulette trademarks, which establishes corporate identity, but trademark registration is not a moderation strategy.

No documented lawsuits, data breaches, or specific CSAM cases tied to Chatrandom in public records. The absence of documented incidents doesn't mean the absence of incidents — it means the absence of public reporting. Random chat platforms operate in a regulatory gray zone where the content is ephemeral, unrecorded, and difficult to audit.

5.4/10. Chatrandom scores above DirtyRoulette at 5.0 because the filter system, Android app, and feature set represent genuine additional product work. It scores below SlutRoulette at 5.8 because SlutRoulette — despite being a Streamate white-label — at least connects you to professional cam models with platform-level moderation. Chatrandom connects you to random strangers with report-based moderation. The scan is heavier than most cam sites. The premium pricing is steep for what amounts to a gender filter. And the fundamental question that applies to every platform in this model — who is on the other end of that camera and what systems exist to ensure they should be — remains unanswered in Chatrandom's public documentation. Mav Media built two versions of the same product. This one has more buttons. The core risk is identical.

⚖️ Compare Chatrandom vs

Payment Methods